Comments on: Not dead (yet) http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/ Everything is hackable Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:33:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Johan http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1265 Johan Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:17:12 +0000 http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/#comment-1265 Why don't you let someone capture them then? Even my local gameshop has the demo's. Why don’t you let someone capture them then? Even my local gameshop has the demo’s.

]]> By: Stephen http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1158 Stephen Thu, 07 Sep 2006 07:26:07 +0000 http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/#comment-1158 Ben: That flies in the face of everything I've been trying to in making the the demos available, Simply put, it's not going to happen, and I'm still considering pulling all the demos that haven't been captured purely via wireless means. It's unlikely that I'll post the second set. Ben: That flies in the face of everything I’ve been trying to in making the the demos available, Simply put, it’s not going to happen, and I’m still considering pulling all the demos that haven’t been captured purely via wireless means. It’s unlikely that I’ll post the second set.

]]> By: Ben http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1157 Ben Thu, 07 Sep 2006 07:12:15 +0000 http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/#comment-1157 Please, add the second download station to your wiki. Just add the entire volume as one entry so it is not such a hassle. I only ask because while I can find the individual demos, I can not find the second loader and I enjoyed sharing the first download station with others. Please, add the second download station to your wiki. Just add the entire volume as one entry so it is not such a hassle. I only ask because while I can find the individual demos, I can not find the second loader and I enjoyed sharing the first download station with others.

]]> By: Johan http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1133 Johan Mon, 04 Sep 2006 11:52:35 +0000 http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/#comment-1133 Well, at least we know you are still alive. I'll play around some more with the old lib then. Well, at least we know you are still alive. I’ll play around some more with the old lib then.

]]> By: Stephen http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1127 Stephen Sun, 03 Sep 2006 18:24:40 +0000 http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/#comment-1127 Ad-hoc is not so hard, really - however the hardware has made it nearly impossible to do properly yet- I still have a lot of experimenting to do before it becomes feasable. It is something I'm working on, but, not very high priority; and if I could have made it work by now I would have (note the official Nintendo stuff doesn't support ad-hoc; it's likely they're running into the same problems I have.) Ad-hoc is not so hard, really – however the hardware has made it nearly impossible to do properly yet- I still have a lot of experimenting to do before it becomes feasable. It is something I’m working on, but, not very high priority; and if I could have made it work by now I would have (note the official Nintendo stuff doesn’t support ad-hoc; it’s likely they’re running into the same problems I have.)

]]> By: MrShlee http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1123 MrShlee Sun, 03 Sep 2006 12:06:34 +0000 http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/#comment-1123 I was wondering why you have been quieter then normal. With the release of the Wii, I wonder if they have decided to use the same hardware as the Gamecube or even the DS for wifi. Thats going to be a wonderful thing to play with :D Keep it up man. Ad-Hoc would be excellent but I'm going to assume the protocol is a little bit tricky on a 33hz arm7.. I was wondering why you have been quieter then normal.

With the release of the Wii, I wonder if they have decided to use the same hardware as the Gamecube or even the DS for wifi.

Thats going to be a wonderful thing to play with :D

Keep it up man. Ad-Hoc would be excellent but I’m going to assume the protocol is a little bit tricky on a 33hz arm7..

]]> By: Kenny http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1113 Kenny Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:11:10 +0000 http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/#comment-1113 When is Ad-Hoc gonna come? in the rewrite? When is Ad-Hoc gonna come?
in the rewrite?

]]> By: Stephen http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1108 Stephen Sat, 02 Sep 2006 08:26:13 +0000 http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/#comment-1108 DSTunnel, unfortuantely, is not in my new list of projects to be actively working on at the moment - it is still something I'd like to do, but other things are taking priority for now. DSTunnel, unfortuantely, is not in my new list of projects to be actively working on at the moment – it is still something I’d like to do, but other things are taking priority for now.

]]> By: jas2o http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1107 jas2o Sat, 02 Sep 2006 08:20:54 +0000 http://blog.akkit.org/2006/09/01/not-dead-yet/#comment-1107 Has any work been done on dstunnel ? Or has it been ditched (for now) ? Has any work been done on dstunnel ? Or has it been ditched (for now) ?

]]>